Which of the following is true regarding unlawful arrests?

The assertion that unlawful arrests have no impact on prosecution is not accurate. In fact, an unlawful arrest can significantly affect how a case is prosecuted. Typically, evidence obtained as a result of an unlawful arrest may be deemed inadmissible in court due to the exclusionary rule, which aims to deter police misconduct. This means that if law enforcement does not follow proper procedures when making an arrest, any evidence gathered as a result of that arrest may not be used against the defendant in a trial.

The proper choice explains that unlawful arrests can indeed invalidate subsequent evidence. This principle reinforces the importance of lawful procedures in ensuring that a defendant's rights are protected and that justice is served fairly. In some instances, an unlawful arrest can lead to the dismissal of charges, although this does not happen automatically; the defendant must often file specific motions to challenge the admissibility of evidence or the validity of the charges. Furthermore, an appeal can be pursued in certain circumstances, but this is not the case universally across all types of legal situations. Overall, the nature of an unlawful arrest has real implications for the prosecution and the judicial process.