Which of the following options is NOT available to a detainee after receiving Miranda warnings?

A detainee who receives Miranda warnings is informed of their rights related to self-incrimination and the right to an attorney. When they choose to continue talking without limitations, they are essentially foregoing their right to remain silent. The essence of the Miranda warning is to ensure that individuals understand their rights when they are in custody and subject to interrogation.

Being able to waive their Miranda rights means that the detainee can choose to speak with law enforcement despite knowing they have the right to remain silent. Moreover, asserting the right to remain silent allows the individual to halt any interrogation, which protects them from self-incrimination. Consulting with an attorney is another critical right under Miranda, allowing the detainee to seek legal counsel before making a decision about speaking to law enforcement.

Therefore, the only option that does not align with the purpose of the Miranda warning is the ability to continue speaking without limitations, as it undermines the detainee's right to pause and consider their options regarding self-incrimination.